In "Alice in Wonderland," there is something neither Alice Wonderland.
This is the assumption that we must start to talk about the films of Tim Burton, expected by his fans (and many others) and load the expectation that a union so far promised to bring to the screen.
One of the most visionary directors with a taste for images that are familiar, in comparison with the novel as imaginative literature of the second half of 1800.
But all these flights of fancy to no avail.
Because as said this is not the story of Alice.
things first, the film is "elsewhere" than in the book, but that's okay. It is known that the film adaptation should be detached from the book as a matter of "language" and then the sin is venial.
In fact, the point of view that Burton offers us at the beginning is interesting, depicting an anchovy dreamy, detached and _ovviamente_ Dark. Here
tell Burton that we understand.
We understand it is a dark, we realized that he likes things dead and pallor. And we also
understood that he likes Johnny Depp (the actress is wearing makeup that makes Alice _exactly_ like Johnny Depp in "Edward Scissorhands").
Tell him so he puts his soul in peace, and perhaps produces something original for once.
The drama (the viewer) when creeps during the prologue to "fall into the bottomless pit" has character "didactic." The twins, dressed in stripes, the caterpillar on the shoulder of a shoot, which should be painted roses. And here the beast begins to arrampicartisi on the shoulder and nausea to pinch the nostrils of the nose. But deep down want to believe they are gifts, quotations, not to succumb to the temptation of the caption Burton, knowing that their use of Alice in the movie Alice, which can not be considered or masturbation or caption.
Alice falls into the pit, and with it any hope of redemption of the film.
The last moments that refer to the book disappears from the screen at the tenth minute, from then on we witness the show by Tim Burton and Johnny Depp.
And that's what really gets angry.
I understand, finally quel'รจ why love between Burton and Depp.
Both are cannibals.
I do not like Johnny Depp and do not consider him an actor. With all due respect to all those who say "but eeeeh by Jack Sparrow, eeehhhh but have you seen Edward Scissorhands EHHHHH "Ehhh
shit.
I saw them and I repeat "eeehh Fucking"
_al servizio_ An actor is the character.
lapses in character, giving him the vital force to exist.
I think of Robert De Niro in Raging Bull, or more recently to Ian McKellen's Gandalf.
Johnny Depp Johnny Depp is _sempre_.
Jack Sparrow is Johnny Depp.
Edward is Johnny Depp.
Johnny Depp is Willy Wonka.
The enormous ego of the character (real time) Johnny Depp, overflowing out of the person until a blob deadly embrace each different characterization of any person, tinting the whole of a monochromatic shade of eyes turned, and corsets frociarelle funny emoticons. Burton
n this film (and even Willy Wonka and the
has cannibalized the film, not "reread" the concept of slavery but to reduce it to a pliable material and having reviewed his delusions gothic / dark, which frankly, to paraphrase a dear friend of the Genoese "broke the Belinus. The film is not
nothing but a pretext to stage the (presumed) original Burton.
The characters are completely stripped of their meaning and made to serve the director's vision. The story, to avoid having to account for a visionary like _TRUE_ Carroll is thrown in the toilet, Burton and the circus begins.
If we think that with his Batman, the director had shown their ability to manage an existing character and to consult it in masterly fashion here for arrogance or cowardice, has distanced itself from the existing and launches into a re-invention of which we feel to say in all honesty, there was no need.
"Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" and the sequel "Beyond the Looking Glass and what Alice found there" are two stories in which the focus is on lexical and conceptual nonsense. A fantastic journey into a world without rules and away from the usual narrative styles. Light years away from achieving hero / heroine antagonist co-star. Short story with a series of Props we clean your ass, and proudly.
Disney Mom could not allow that to happen, so full of 'fuck the literature, reinvented! Ale do shit! Come on! We have the 3d, we have Johnny Depp! 'Carroll fuck, piss on his head all and all the nonsense and take ... Let's give them a sense
.
I would repeat it. Let's give them a sense
.
But above all but
So here's the part that Shrekkiana trivialization of the plot.
No it is not a comic parable, the film is the same as Shrek, the yield will be, will be for the plot, but if we take away for a moment the trees rolled in the background, really seems to see the classic fairy tale fantasy for a while 'There has been shaped on the screens. The talking animals in the original concept that conveyed the alienation of the protagonist, here become petulant _insopportabili_ mice and rabbits verbose. But I would like
that is clear, do not defend Carroll because "ah the film is different from the book chemmerda" like I'm one of those who set himself on fire in the streets because Jackson did not include Tom Bombadil in his Lord of the Rings (my choice greeted with cheers worthy of a goal to '
The defending because his work was completely ignored, exploited for the title slyly, and then not only forgotten (which would have preserved the characters in the popular imagination at least) no! Carroll was mutilated, makeup, enslaved to the wishes of a director in the crisis that has smeared his shit stolen on canvas artist.
The desire to "explain" the nonsense, permeates every step of the film, based on assumptions (of course) inconsistent with the characterization. The result is a meeting between the need to motivate the unmotivated, pulling the feet that people are inherently inconsistent.
A little 'as if we saw a film on "The Betrothed 2, Return on Lake Como, where he discovers that Lucy is a Ninja and a former Renzo lansquenet retired.
We are told everything, even the recipe for the potion that is shrinking (again, once, twice, three times then you broke Tim's cock.)
Why?
Why??
The thing that the nail in the coffin is that the reading of Burton, but stripped of the sowing of Carroll is still shit. It started as a defense evasion, escape from the closed society of the value of imagination, the importance of dreaming.
And it ends with Alice Young tycoon intercontinental trade.
Again
Alice, a young tycoon intercontinental trade.
What the fuck is that?
phrase I learned from the whispered awe for the duration of the film.
In summary, if you want to see that Burton and Depp, screaming like two sluts you feel heat in the clothes of her mother (Carroll) go see this movie, but be aware that Burton had hit bottom.
Forget everything you know Alice's really because this is another film.
A film of shit.
0 comments:
Post a Comment